hamming distance
HOGWILD!-Gibbs can be PanAccurate
Asynchronous Gibbs sampling has been recently shown to be fast-mixing and an accurate method for estimating probabilities of events on a small number of variables of a graphical model satisfying Dobrushin's condition~\cite{DeSaOR16}. We investigate whether it can be used to accurately estimate expectations of functions of {\em all the variables} of the model. Under the same condition, we show that the synchronous (sequential) and asynchronous Gibbs samplers can be coupled so that the expected Hamming distance between their (multivariate) samples remains bounded by $O(\tau \log n),$ where $n$ is the number of variables in the graphical model, and $\tau$ is a measure of the asynchronicity. A similar bound holds for any constant power of the Hamming distance. Hence, the expectation of any function that is Lipschitz with respect to a power of the Hamming distance, can be estimated with a bias that grows logarithmically in $n$. Going beyond Lipschitz functions, we consider the bias arising from asynchronicity in estimating the expectation of polynomial functions of all variables in the model.
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Europe > Austria (0.04)
- Asia > China > Anhui Province > Hefei (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)
- Transportation > Passenger (0.46)
- Transportation > Ground > Road (0.46)
- Automobiles & Trucks (0.46)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > United States > North Carolina (0.04)
- Europe (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Africa > Middle East > Tunisia > Ben Arous Governorate > Ben Arous (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > Wales (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.14)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > France > Île-de-France > Paris > Paris (0.04)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Prince George's County > Adelphi (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Government > Military (0.47)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.47)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.05)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County > Philadelphia (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)